1.    الشامي،. أحمد محمد ؛ حسب الله، السيد (1988)، المعجم الموسوعي لمصطلحات المكتبات والمعلومات: إنجليزي عربي (بالعربية والإنجليزية)، الرياض: دار المريخ. https://archive.org/details/SHM1988ENAR/page/382/mode/2up?view=theater

2.عبد الهادي، محمد فتحي.(د.ت). مقدمة في علم المعلومات . القاهرة: دار الغريب

3.    A guide to reference and documentation. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/informedwriter/chapter11.pdf

4.    الأخضر، إ. (2021). التوثيق في البحث العلمي. مجلة العلوم الإنسانية، 5(2)، 249-286. Retrieved from https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/downArticle/511/5/2/175050

5.بدر، أ حمد نور. تكنولوجيا المعلومات وأساسيات استرجاع المعلومات . دار الثقافة العلمية للنشر و التوزيع . ط1 . مصر . 2000 

6.بشر ، ماجد أحمد عبد العزيز. أنظمة المعلومات ودورها في دعم القرارات الإدارية. مصر: المنظمة العربية للتنمية الإدارية، 2015.

7.جاسم محمد جرجيس أ.م.د.صباح محمد كلو. مقدمة في علم المكتبات والمعلومات.https://sd47351f587cab14e.jimcontent.com/download/version/1526150155/module/12778488531/name/%D9%85%D9%82%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9%20%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA%20-%20%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85%20%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%20%D8%AC%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B3%20%D9%88%20%D8%B5%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AD%20%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%20%D9%83%D9%84%D9%88.pdf [https://sd47351f587cab14e.jimcontent.com/download/version/1526150155/module/12778488531/name/%D9%85%D9%82%D8%AF%D9%85%D8%A9%20%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%85%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%AA%20-%20%D8%AC%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85%20%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%20%D8%AC%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B3%20%D9%88%20%D8%B5%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AD%20%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF%20%D9%83%D9%84%D9%88.pdf]

8.    جبر، هاني. (2007).استراتيجيات البحث وتقنية استخدام قواعد المعلومات في جامعة النجاح الوطنية. متاح على الرابط: http://www.journal.cybrarians.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=422:2009-08-02-08-12-54&catid=137:2009-05-20-09-51-17

9.حمزة مروة(د.ت). مصادر البحث الوثائقي: التقليدية والرقمية. جامعة الامير عبد الفادر. على العنوان: http://elearning.univ-biskra.dz/moodle/pluginfile.php/654420/mod_folder/content/0/hamza-marwa.pdf?forcedownload=1

10. الحویج,، عبدالمجید محمد. (2021). المعلومات مفهومها وخصائصها وأهمیتها في اتخاذ القرارعلى العنوان: https://dspace.zu.edu.ly/bitstream/handle/1/1216/10.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

11. سعاد، ب. الش., & سليمة، س. (2013). استراتيجية البحث عن المعلومات الإلكترونية. مجلة دراسات وأبحاث في المعلومات والتوثيق العلمي والتكنولوجي، 2(2).

12. سعاد، بن الشعيرة، & سليمة، سعدي. (2013). استراتيجية البحث عن المعلومات الإلكترونية. دار بهاء الدين. مجلة دراسات وأبحاث في المعلومات والتوثيق العلمي والتكنولوجي، 2(2)، 80.

13. السمرائي، إيمان فاضل. أبو عجمية، سيري أحمد. قواعد البيانات ونظم المعلومات في المكتبات ومراكز المعلومات.عمان: دار المسيرة للنشر والتوزيع، 2009

14. شعلال، سليمة، & بودريان، عز الدين. (2015(. الحاجة إلى التدريب الإلكتروني على البحث الوثائقي لدى الأساتذة والباحثين المنخرطين في النظام الوطني للتوثيق الإلكتروني SNDL بالجزائر: دراسة حالة جامعة تبسة. Jordan Journal of Libraries & Information, 50(3). متاح على الرابط: https://ajadi.weebly.com/uploads/8/6/6/1/86616634/%D8%B9%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%8608-corr.pdf

15. شيهب، ع. (2021). البحث الوثائقي في العلوم الاجتماعية: أبعاد جديدة في بناء المعرفة الأكاديمية. مجلة الرسالة للدراسات والبحوث الإنسانية، 6(3). مُسترجَع من https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/165034

16. الصاوي ياسر، ادارة المعرفة و تكنولوجيا المعلومات . دار السحاب للنشر و التوزيع . ط1 . مصر . 2007

17. ضيش، محمد عبد الواحد.(1997). استخدام واعداد الببليوجرافيات: او القوائم الاعلامية بالانتاج الفكري. دار الفكر العربي: القاهرة

18. عاشور، حبيبة. (2016).. دور الأساتذة الجامعيين في تفعيل مفهوم الكلية الخفية والبحث عن المعلومات: دراسة ميدانية بجامعة قسنطينة (أطروحة دكتوراه، جامعة قسنطينة).

19. عليان، ربحي مصطفى(2009). طرق جمع البيانات والمعلومات لاغراض البحث العلمي .عمان: دار الصفاء

20. غنيم، ريهام عاصم. (2023). سلوكيات البحث عن المعلومات في البيئة الرقمية لدى طالب المرحلة الجامعية األولى بكلية اآلداب والعلوم اإلنسانية بجامعة طيبة: دراسة ميدانية. مجلة بحوث كلية الآداب، 35(2)، 319-340.  https://sjam.journals.ekb.eg/article_328268_7f765bf49c2ad246074fbc7ca01ced8b.pdf

21. فالح حسن راهي.(2019). مصادر المعلومات 3/22/2019 انواعها و طرق تقسيمها.

22. الفرحان، ليلي عبد الواحد (1992) . الببليوغرافيا: تطورها وأنواعها اساليب اعدادها. جامعة بغداد: قسم المكتبات المعلومات.

23. قاسم، حشمت(د.ت). مدخل لدراسة المكتبات والمعلومات . القاهرة: دار الغريب

24. قبلي، ف.، & كادي، ز. (2022). سلوك البحث عن المعلومات: دراسة مقارنة لبعض النماذج. الحوار المتوسطي، 13(2)، 154-175.. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/202049

25. قندليجي، ع. ا. (2007). البحث العلمي واستخدام مصادر المعلومات التقليدية والإلكترونية: أسسه، أساليبه، مفاهمه، أدواته. عمان: دار المسيرة.

26. لبديري، م., & بودودة، س. (2023). البحث الوثائقي والباحث المبتدئ: من المكتبة التقليدية إلى المكتبة الرقمية. مجلة األكادميية للدراسات االجتماعية واإلنسانية.مج.15،ع.2. ص329-337. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/22808

27.   المصري، أحمد طلبة. قواعد البيانات في المكتبات ومراكز المعلومات. عمان: مؤسسة الوراق للنشر والتوزيع ،2015.

28. معجم المعاني الجامع.(د.ت). الوثيقة. https://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/%D9%88%D8%AB%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9/?

29. عرعار، بهية (2015). مصادر المعلومات من الحضارات القديمة إلى عصر المعلومات. مجلة علم المكتبات، 7(1)، 53-63. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/38336

30. النجار، قايز جمعة. نظم المعلومات الإدارية منظور  إداري. ط3.عمان :دار الحامد للنشر والتوزيع، 2010

31. الهوش، أبو بكر محمود. (2013). أدوات البحث عن المعلومات في البيئة الرقمية. القاهرة: دار السحاب للنشر والتوزيع.

32.     .Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3–9.

33.     Alazemi, M. (2023). Investigating the information-seeking behavior of undergraduate students who utilize kuwait academic library database. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research, 08(02), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijaemr.2023.8204

34.     Arora, R. (2018). Information s ources, systems and services. INFLIBNET Centre. https://ebooks-inflibnet-ac-in.translate.goog/lisp4/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=ar&_x_tr_hl=ar&_x_tr_pto=wapp

35.     Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association.

36.     Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2009). The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 180–191.

37.     Bernnard, D., Bobish, G., Hecker, J., Holden, I., Hosier, A., Jacobson, T., Loney, T., & Bullis, D. (2014). The information literacy user’s guide: An open, online textbook. Greg Bobish & Trudi Jacobson (Eds.). https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/the-information-literacy-users-guide-an-open-online-textbook/

38.     Bouguetaf, M. (2024). Methodology of citation, documentation, marginalization, and writing of sources and references in the social sciences and humanities. International Journal of Educational and Social Science Engineering, 16(4), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.48047/intjecse/v16i4.4

39.     Brettle, A. (2018). The information specialist as an expert searcher (pp. 269–288). Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303755.014

40.     Bruit documentaire. (n.d.). Savoirs CDI. Retrieved from https://www.reseau-canope.fr/savoirscdi/chercher/dictionnaire-des-concepts-info-documentaires/b/bruit-documentaire.html

41.    Burgin, M. (2004). Data, Information and Knowledge. INFORMATION-YAMAGUCHI-, 7(1), 47-58.

42.     Byström, K., Kumpulainen, S., Pharo, N., & Ruthven, I. (2024). The concept of information need and its operationalization in CHIIR research. https://doi.org/10.1145/3627508.3638290

43.     Cambridge International AS & A Level Information Technology 9626. (2017). Topic 1.1: Data, information, and knowledge. Cambridge Assessment International Education.web site: https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/images/285017-data-information-and-knowledge.pdf

44.     Case, D.O., & Given, L.M. (2016). Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. This book offers a comprehensive review of information seeking research. https://books.google.dz/books?hl=ar&lr=&id=IAYvDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=%E2%80%A2%09Case,+D.O.,+%26+Given,+L.M.+(2016).+Looking+for+Information:+A+Survey+of+Research+on+Information+Seeking,+Needs,+and+Behavior.+This+book+offers+a+comprehensive+review+of+information+seeking+research&ots=Y-OSlwrRA4&sig=an25UmAi3-Oh5BpDydlDoJVNxmo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

45.     Chino Valley Unified School District. (n.d.). CRAP test: Evaluating sources. Retrieved from https://www.chino.k12.ca.us/cms/lib/CA01902308/Centricity/Domain/3438/CRAP%20Test.pdf

46.     Chowdhury, S., Gibb, F., & Landoni, M. (2011). Uncertainty in information seeking and retrieval: A study in an academic environment. Information Processing & Management, 47(2), 157–175. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.09.006 

47.     Cole, C., & Wilson, T. D. (2024). Information need: what is it? 73–97. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035343706.00013

48.     Crump, K. (2013, September). The Information Explosion. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256976912_The_Information_Explosion

49.     Davenport, E. (2010). Confessional methods and everyday life information seeking. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44(1), 533-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2010.1440440119

50.     Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press.

51.     Demergazzi, S., Pastore, L., Bassani, G., Arosio, M., & Lonati, C. (2020). Information Needs and Information-Seeking Behavior of Italian Neurologists: Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/14979

52.     Dervin, B. (1992). From the Mind's Eye of the User: The Sense-Making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology. In J.D. Glazier & R.R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management, discusses the sense-making approach to understanding information behavior. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/2438/files/Dervin1992a.htm

53.     Dong, J., Feng, Y., Li, Y., Tan, C., Wadhwa, B., & Wang, H. (2015). Bowl: augmenting the semantic web with beliefs. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 11(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-015-0243-9

54.     Giordan, A. (n.d.). Former à la recherche d’infos: pourquoi et comment? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Caroline_Fatoux-Gallant/publication/265251064_Former_a_la_recherche_d'infos_pourquoi_et_comment/links/5406664b0cf2c48563b24fe4.pdf

55.     Griffiths, J. (2017). Information use in a digital age. London, UK: Facet Publishing.

56.     Hamad, F., Al-Fadel, M., & Fakhouri, H. (2020). The effect of librarians’ digital skills on technology acceptance in academic libraries in jordan. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(4), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620966644

57.     Harrison, S. (n.d.). Documenting and attributing sources. Retrieved from https://writing.eckerd.edu/tips/documenting

58.     Hock, R. (2013). The extreme searcher’s Internet handbook: A guide for the serious searcher. Information Today, Inc.

59.     Hyldegård, J., Hertzum, M., & Hansen, P. (2015). Studying collaborative information seeking: experiences with three methods., 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18988-8_2

60.     Ibraheem, N. and Mustafa, B. (2013). State of art: semantic web. Al-Rafidain Journal of Computer Sciences and Mathematics, 10(1), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.33899/csmj.2013.163434

61.     Idaho Pressbooks. (n.d.). Information needs. Write & Cite: Research and Writing Skills for Academic and Graduate Writing. Retrieved from https://idaho.pressbooks.pub/write/chapter/information-needs/

62.     Johnson, F. (2018). From accessibility to assess-ability: an evaluation heuristic based on cognitive engagement in search., 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_53

63.     Johnson, J. D. (2003). On contexts of information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 39(5), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4573(02)00030-4

64.     Khan, S. and Bhatti, R. (2017). Digital competencies for developing and managing digital libraries. The Electronic Library, 35(3), 573-597. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-06-2016-0133

65.     Kinsey, E., Dupuis, R., Morgan, A., D’Alonzo, B., Epstein, C., Klusaritz, H., … & Cannuscio, C. (2018). Public libraries as partners for health. Preventing Chronic Disease, 15. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170392

66.     Krubu, D. E., Zinn, S., & Hart, G. (2017). Making Sense of the Information Seeking Process of Undergraduates in a Specialised University: Revelations from Dialogue Journaling on WhatsApp Messenger. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 13, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.28945/3640

67.     Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, outlines the stages of the information search process. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5628627881cc1a7361dc70e1f6c8608cce1104ac

68.     Kumar, A. and Dwivedi, S. (2011). Ontology exemplification for aspocms in the semantic web., 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1109/wict.2011.6141291

69.     Kwanya, T., Stilwell, C., & Underwood, P. G. (2015). Library 3.0 librarianship. Library 3.0, 95–135. doi:10.1016/b978-1-84334-718-7.00004-7 

70.     Lasserre, K. (2012). Expert searching in health librarianship: a literature review to identify international issues and Australian concerns. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 29(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00974.x

71.     Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Huang, W. (2016). The exploration of objective task difficulty and domain knowledge effects on users' query formulation. *Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53*(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301063

72.     Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42(2), 583–592. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002

73.     Lloyd, A. (2007). Information literacy landscapes: Information literacy in education, workplace and everyday contexts. Chandos Publishing.

74.     Madden, A.D. (2000), "A definition of information", Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 52 No. 9, pp. 343-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007027

75.     Madhu, G., Govardhan, A., & Rajinikanth, T. (2011). Intelligent semantic web search engines: a brief survey. International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 2(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijwest.2011.2103

76.     Mashwani, S. and Khusro, S. (2018). The design and development of a semantic file system ontology. Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research, 8(2), 2827-2833. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.1898

77.     Mason, R. O. (1990). What is an information professional? Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 31(2), 122–138. Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE). http://www.jstor.org/stable/40323396

78.     Meriam Library. (n.d.). Evaluating information – Applying the CRAAP test. California State University, Chico. Retrieved from https://library.csuchico.edu/sites/default/files/craap-test.pdf

79.     Mesguich, V., & Thomas, A. (2006). Net Recherche : Le guide pratique pour mieux trouver l’information utile. Paris: ADBS.

80.     Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.

81.     Michalkova, D., Parra-Rodriguez, M. A., & Moshfeghi, Y. (2022). Information Need Awareness: An EEG Study. Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477495.3531999

82.     Michalkova, D., Rodriguez, M. P., & Moshfeghi, Y. (2022). Drivers of Information Needs: A Behavioural Study – Exploring Searcher’s Feeling-of-Knowing. International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/3539813.3545125

83.     Monchaux, S., Amadieu, F., Chevalier, A., & Marine, J. (2015). Query strategies during information searching: effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved. Information Processing & Management, 51(5), 557-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.05.004

84.     Moshfeghi, Y., Triantafillou, P., & Pollick, F. (2016). Understanding information need., 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2911534

85.     Na, K. (2014). Exploring the effect of mental demand in web searches: a pilot study. *Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48*(2), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2014.48.2.379

86.     Naumer, C. (2017). Information Needs. Retrieved from ResearchGate. DOI: 10.1081/E-ELIS4.

87.     Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K., Tenopir, C., & Herman, E. (2014). Peer review: Still king in the digital age. Learned Publishing, 27(1), 15–21.

88.     Nonthacumjane, P. (2011). Key skills and competencies of a new generation of LIS professionals. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 37(4), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035211430475

89.     Obim, I., Ukwueze, P., & Nwadike, C. (2024). Utilization of blockchain technology for effective circulation control in university libraries in south-east, nigeria. Information Impact Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 14(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v14i2.1

90.     Parveaz, S., & Khan, A. (2022). Understanding Information Seeking Behavior of Users in Academic Context (A Critical Review of Literature). ECS Transactions, 107(1), 9673–9694. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.9673ecst

91.     Patel, P. Y., & Oza, N. D. (2021). Models of information seeking behaviour: An overview. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8(9), b142. Retrieved from www.jetir.org

92.     Patel, P. Y., & Oza, N. D. (2021). Models of information seeking behaviour: An overview. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 8(9), b142. Retrieved from www.jetir.org

93.     Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2013). The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge.

94.     Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.

95.     Ruthven, I. (2018). The language of information need: Differentiating conscious and formalized information needs. Information Processing and Management. Retrieved from www.elsevier.com/locate/infoproman

96.     Satija, M.P. (2013). Information: Nature, importance, and functions. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 60(2), 128-133. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286980383_Information_Nature_importance_and_functions

97.    Search. Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/search

98.     Service d'appui au succès scolaire de l'Université d'Ottawa. Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources, https://uottawa.libguides.com/redaction_technique_scientifique/types_de_sources

99.     Shahzad, K., Khan, S., Latif, M., & Iqbal, A. (2023). Relationship between personal traits and sustainable competence development among librarians in relation to value-added library services in a networked world: a systematic literature review from 2002 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(3), 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032359

100.              Sharma, P. (2009). New skills for LIS professionals in technology-intensive environment. University of Delhi

101.              Spark Jones, K., R. Bennett, et al. (2005). E-resources for research in the humanities and social sciences: A British Academic Policy Review,3 (5). British Academy https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/documents/1904/Eresources_in_Humanities_and_Social_Sciences-BA_Review-2005.pdf

102.   Streefkerk, R. (2019, April 12). Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research | Differences, Examples & Methods. [Scribbr]. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-quantitative-research/

103.   Suber, P. (2012). Open access. MIT Press.

104.   Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

105.              Taylor, R. (2015). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 76(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.76.3.251

106.              Tella, A. and Soluoku, T. (2016). Usage analysis of web 2.0 and library 2.0 tools by librarians in kwara state academic libraries. Education for Information, 32(3), 225-247. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-160975

107.              Theng, Y., Lee, E., Chu, S., Lee, C., Chiu, M., & Chan, R. (2015). Scaffolding in information search: effects on less experienced searchers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 48(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000615595455

108.              Tibau, M., Siqueira, S., & Nunes, B. (2022). Mapping knowledge flows in exploratory web searches. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.669

109.              Timmins, F. (2006). Exploring the concept of ‘information need’. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 12(6), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172x.2006.00597.x

110.              Université Laval. (n.d.). Affiche interactive 3QPOC. Retrieved from http://www.faireunerecherche.fse.ulaval.ca/evaluer/ressources/outils/

111.              Universiteitsbibliotheek. (n.d.). LibGuides. Retrieved from https://libguides.library.uu.nl/search-strategy/formulating-the-searchquestion

112.             University of California, Berkeley Library. (2023, January 18). Citing sources. https://www.lib.berkeley.edu/

113.              University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center. (2003). Documentation styles. Retrieved from https://www.mayvillestate.edu/files/6313/5785/0195/Documentation_Styles.pdf

114.              University of Maryland Global Campus. (n.d.). Chapter 5: Writing and citing. Retrieved from https://www.umgc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/writing-center/online-guide-to-writing/tutorial/chapter5/ch5-12

115.   Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: A summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44–60.

116.   Van Lieshout, L. L., de Lange, F. P., & Cools, R. (2020). Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.005

117.              Vanitha, K., Yasudha, K., VENKATESH, D., & Sowjanya, K. (2013). Semantic e-learn services and intelligent systems using web ontology. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2013.040121

118.              W&M. (2018). Documenting sources. Writing Resources Center. Retrieved from https://www.wm.edu/as/wcc/newresources/handouts/documenting-sources.pdf

119.              Wang, Y., Liu, J., Mandal, S., & Shah, C. (2017). Search successes and failures in query segments and search tasks: a field study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401047

120.              Wilson, T. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progresss.ResearchGate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246471766

121.              Wilson, T. D. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress? International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). Retrieved from https://origin-archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla62/62-devf.htm

122.   Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human Information Behavior. Informing Science, explores the socio-psychological aspects of information behavior. https://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/2000HIB.pdf

123.   Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Stanford History Education Group.

124.   Xiangjie, X. (2018). Information searching method.

125.              Yoo, S., Kim, Y., & Park, S. (2013). An educational tool for browsing the semantic web. Informatics in Education, 12(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2013.10

126.              Zarié, A. (2019). L’utilisation du 3QPOC en classe d’univers social au secondaire. Revue de la SPHQ, 57(3). Retrieved from https://images.sdm.qc.ca/fichiers/Public/2019/B982839.pdf

127.    Zimmer, M. (2008). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325.

Modifié le: samedi 19 avril 2025, 10:46